Swimming_trouble_718
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
|
 p.2 #2 · Recommend a tripod and tripod head for Sony 300 GM 2.8 | |
Swimming_trouble_718 wrote:
Hello all,
I’m looking for recommendations for a tripod and tripod head to use mainly with my Sony set up including the 300 GM 2.8, 70-200 GM II, 24-70 etc. I’ve been using a cheaper tripod with it but in general it’s been a clunky set up and doesn’t seem to work well with the 300 GM. I think I would prefer something with lever locks as opposed to twist locks as my tripod has twist locks and I find them pretty slow to set up and inevitably one isn’t twisted properly and I have to go back and tighten it, this might be better with a more expensive tripod though? I’d like something that isn’t monstrous that I can hike with, but also is reliable and has no problem with my gear. Also it would be great if it could attach to my peak design capture clips as well as a standard plate (arca Swiss?). Thanks!...Show more →
---------------------------------------------
deevee wrote:
I use this Leofoto https://leofotousa.com/products/leofoto-ls-364cx-ranger-series-tripod-ballhead-set
and fluid ballhead for video/stills/birding https://leofotousa.com/products/leofoto-bv-5-mini-compact-fluid-heads-with-plate-tilt-lock-design-only-528g-support-scopes-binoculars-and-cameras-that-weigh-up-to-9-lb
Combo is light and perfect for A1 and 300mm
If you prefer lever lock I suggest this quick release Tribex https://www.smallrig.com/campaigns/TRIBEX-Series-Tripods?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=19782537798&utm_content=191218152691&utm_term=smallrig%20potato%20jet&gadid=774506564099&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=19782537798&gbraid=0AAAAA9ksdxmhoKQvph7Ls4APxpHMemGvd&gclid=CjwKCAjw0sfHBhB6EiwAQtv5qeGpTbUGVstj2BJrsMnFqmP8eKSf5k7ZSQBxrZL2cd2ekRdBYQzPrBoCd1gQAvD_BwE
If I haven't bought the Leofoto, I'd get the Tribex instead
Best wishes
---------------------------------------------
deevee wrote:
The best Leofoto carbon tripods prices range from $150 to $350
The thicker the legs the more expensive
I recommend the Ranger series and 4-segment legs
I have the LS-364c model
I had the cheaper ones but they are not sturdy enough especially in the wind
Buy once and never look back, don’t skimp
---------------------------------------------
robert614 wrote:
I would recommend the Leofoto LS-284CX
It’s a good all around tripod. Carbon fiber, 4 section, twist locks, about 2.5lbs.
Can handle the 300mm GM easily. You can probably go as heavy as a 400-800mm if you want
On sale now at B&H for $209.90
Not sure if you have a ball head already. The Leofoto LH-36 is good. Has a separate friction nob. On sale at B&H for $104
If you want a gimbal, the Sirui PH-10 or 20 are pretty good and inexpensive. On sale at (you guessed it) B&H for $167 and $178 respectively
---------------------------------------------
amv8 wrote:
OK, I have a bit of feedback for you given that I have both the 70-200 f2.8 and 300 f2.8. I mostly use an Acratech Panoramic head in combination with a leveling base. It's light and durable, much, much lighter than the RRS BH-55 head mentioned above. I also like to do panorama landscape shots, and the head with leveling base makes it easy to keep things aligned. With that said, it's expensive and not perfect as there are some features I'd like to see added in a future revision. I also have the matching Acratech leveling base. I find the Acratech leveling base harder to precisely level than, for example, the Leofoto which I also have (the Leofoto is cheaper but has a very small spirit level).
For wildlife/sports I also have a Jobu Design Jr.3 Deluxe gimbal setup. I've only used it a few times, but just recently used it with my 300 f2.8 to photograph some rodeo. Wow, it worked great allowing me to track riders and quickly switch back and forth with another body with the 70-200 f2.8 which I was hand holding. While I think the Jobu Design is great value for the $$, unfortunately it's gone up in price recently (it's a Canadian product).
For tripods, I have both the RRS Ultralight 24L and a Leofoto LS-284 CEX (built in leveling base). The RRS is a good tripod, sturdy and stable and provides ample height in a fairly compact package. It's also quite expensive. Would I buy it again at current prices? No, I'd investigate other options. The Leofoto is more compact, less expensive, and of course not as stable, well built, or heavy as the RRS. However, it did work fine with the 300 f2.8 and gimbal setup that I mentioned above. You mentioned not needing that tall of a tripod. One caveat, especially with landscapes, is that you may be shooting on a hillside or on some rocks and the extra leg extension can come in handy. The challenge for me is getting a tripod with long enough leg extension, sufficient stability, and folded length that I can carry it on an aircraft.
...Show more →
---------------------------------------------
It looks like the leofoto ranger series gets a lot of recommendations and doesn't cost a grand. Looking over the specs it looks promising however I'm not sure which model would suit me best between the 284 vs 364. It looks like the 364 can hold more weight but isn't as tall? Although there seems to be an optional center column that can extend the height. It's also heavier. I am 5'10" but my eye level is roughly at 65" without any shoes on. The 300 gm + teleconverters is my heaviest lens so far, but I really enjoy wildlife photography so I bet a bigger heavier lens is in my future at some point. I'd like to account for that as well if possible.
|
