fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada

  
 
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


I've never seen the Milky Way so was planning a trip for some hiking and MW viewing. Specifically, Glacier National Park in Montana and Banff in Canada.

Based on previous research, I know that the skies needs to be dark, away from light pollution and the light of the moon. It looks like the new moon will be on September 11, 2026. So I am thinking to be in one park a few days before this date, and then make my way to the other park a week or so later. It's only a four hour drive between both parks so should be doable.

However, I had a few preliminary questions for those more experienced than myself:



  1. How "dark" does the sky need to be in relation to the moon phases (e.g. 3rd Quater ok? First quarter ok?, etc.)? Just trying to dermine my window for optimal MW viewing and photography.
  2. It seems like the Fall Equinox is around September 22-23, 2026. Google AI says that it's a great time for MW viewing, but it looks like it's almost a full moon at that point. Do I ignore Google AI? lol


Any other considerations are helpful, especially with regards to gear! I was thinking 5DSR because of the high resolution but afraid it might not be great at high ISOs. So maybe the 5D4 or a crop camera like the Fuji XT2? As far as full-frame lenses, I have the Samyang 14mm f2.4 XP. For the Fuji, I have a variety the Samyang 12mm f2. But I have many other lenses I can bring along so suggestions are welcome.

Thank you!



Dec 31, 2025 at 12:25 AM
jgoetz4
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


A dark, clear moonless night (New Moon) with little, if any wind. A 5d4 is fine along with a 14-28 lens, and a fast aperture (1.4 -2.0) and a high iso, on a tripod. You'll get more recommendations.
Jim



Dec 31, 2025 at 10:15 AM
AmbientMike
Offline
• • • • • •
[X]
p.1 #3 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Good view in rural skies here, see it ftom the yard. Your profile says NYC, you shouldn't have to drive too far, really, to see it. Long Island or upstate should have good views in rural areas especially having little or no light pollution to the south

You can certainly see it in September, galactic center area July and August better, though imo. Gets high in the sky later in the eveningin July, not sure if it gets maximum height by September. Glacier and Banff sound far north I'd probably go further south, so its higher in the sky, Cuchera Pass in CO for one is excellent very dark and high elevation

I'd go at least 3 days after the full moon, to see it in the evening, maybe a bit more,you have no moon then, and you don't want any. I think you'd want after the new moon to see it 4 a.m. in the morning in April or maybe May. Yes ignore Google AI, I dont think the fall equinox has anything to do milky way viewing



Dec 31, 2025 at 10:54 AM
burningheart
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Ming-Tzu wrote:
So I am thinking to be in one park a few days before this date, and then make my way to the other park a week or so later. It's only a four hour drive between both parks so should be doable.



I live in Calgary and make many trips to Glacier for camping. Don't count on a 4 hour drive it will be a longer depending on where you start from in Glacier and where you plan on staying in the Banff area and the route you select to travel from Glacier to Banff. Another option to think about is Jasper National Park north of Banff which is the second largest Dark-Sky Preserve in the world

If you are camping in Glacier be aware the Two Medicine Campground is closed to camping in 2026 while they replace the water lines and other infrastructure. They did that in 2025 with Many Glacier located on the north side of the park. Many Glacier reopens for 2026.

Don't rely on autofocusing use manual focusing. When I photographed night skies in Two Medicine I found that AF was mainly hunting, most of the time I used my Zeiss Otus lenses 28,55 and 100. You don't need that level of lens but I have them and the hard stop was fully calibrated for sharp focus at infinity, where as my Canon lenses had leeway and a hard stop using manual wasn't necessarily infinity focus.



Dec 31, 2025 at 12:18 PM
live2huntelk
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


https://capturetheatlas.com/how-to-photograph-the-milky-way/

Resource for good viewing dates and times ......have to enter name and email address and it will send you a link with all the different Milky Way viewing calendars.

Download the Milky Way Calendar for the Banff, Canada latitude.

Also lists steps for photographing the Milky Way

here is another resource for sky conditions..... https://www.cleardarksky.com/c/BnffABkey.html?1

Use a red light at night to preserve your night vision while making any changes to equipment.



Dec 31, 2025 at 12:59 PM
jtford9
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


I’m in the Hudson Valley about 120 miles north of you in Brooklyn. Area is pretty rural and a reasonable distance from any light pollution. I shot quite a few Milky Way time lapses on the 5D4. I used the Sigma Art 14 and 20mm. Prefer the more concentrated effect of the Art 20mm.

Definitely want to avoid as much moonlight as possible. I’m not an astronomy expert but it seems to me like the Milky Way and the moon are on comparable paths and the moon’s light would definitely blow out the settings I use for Milky Way time lapses. Darker the better since the darkness doesn’t factor into the exposure. You’re settings are going to be geared towards capturing the light of the MW.

With a fast lens you can keep your ISO at a reasonable speed to not be overly concerned with noise. There’s a recommended formula available online for the right shutter speed to use for your chosen focal length. If you’re going to do time lapse just be aware of the sunrise. The sky starts to brighten before the actual sunrise and will blow out the tail end of video. Final thought is to include an interesting foreground to give the Milky Way some perspective

Edited on Dec 31, 2025 at 07:02 PM · View previous versions



Dec 31, 2025 at 05:19 PM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


jgoetz4 wrote:
A dark, clear moonless night (New Moon) with little, if any wind. A 5d4 is fine along with a 14-28 lens, and a fast aperture (1.4 -2.0) and a high iso, on a tripod. You'll get more recommendations.
Jim


In that case, I might be bringing both the 5D4 and 5DSR. 5D4 strictly for astro and 5DSR for other landscape-type photos. As far as the lens, I might just opt for the Samyang 14mm f2.4 since that's my widest and fastest aperture lens atm. I can go for something like a 24mm but not sure if that's wide enough. I really don't want to stitch lol



Dec 31, 2025 at 07:02 PM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #8 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


AmbientMike wrote:
Good view in rural skies here, see it ftom the yard. Your profile says NYC, you shouldn't have to drive too far, really, to see it. Long Island or upstate should have good views in rural areas especially having little or no light pollution to the south

You can certainly see it in September, galactic center area July and August better, though imo. Gets high in the sky later in the eveningin July, not sure if it gets maximum height by September. Glacier and Banff sound far north I'd probably go further south, so its higher in the sky, Cuchera
...Show more

Yup, I'm in NYC. Just not experienced at all with figuring out where, when and "how" to see it. I don't want to drive hours upstate or deep into Long Island just to be disappointed haha. The only thing I know is times around the New Moon are better because of the moonlight.

Trying to understand the basics of your posts about timing and location. I have to do more research on the whole "movement" of the MW to understand how high/low it is in the sky, when to see it best, etc.

Thanks!



Dec 31, 2025 at 07:07 PM
Chris S.
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


For Milky Way, you don't want any moon at all--even a thin crescent. And you don't want to shoot with a moon just below the horizon, as when it is about to set or rise. Nor do you want to shoot during any of the twilights, including astronomical, if you can help it. A free phone app I like is "Clear Outside," which shows all these things, plus predictions for amount of cloud cover.

With a modern camera, don't shoot a high ISO! Check your camera's dynamic range on something like Photons to Photos. Many cameras will show an inflection point in the moderate ISOs, where amp noise is minimized vs signal, and that is where you want to set your ISO. On my Nikon Z8, this is ISO 500. Your camera will likely vary.

I like to shoot the Milky Way with as wide a lens as possible--usually 14mm. I use a 14mm f/1.4 at f/1.4, but my 14-24 mm f/2.8 works, too.

If you don't use a star tracker, check to see how long an exposure you can use without showing signs of star trailing (elongation of what should be a point of light). At 14mm for me, that's about 10 seconds. (Lower resolution bodies can allow longer.) I strongly suggest taking a series of images at the same settings without moving your camera, then stacking them in a program such as Sequator--this can greatly improve your signal to noise ratio.

If you do use a star tracker, you can use a much longer shutter speed. In this case, keep your shutter open long enough to fill the left quarter or third of your histogram. (This will keep bright stars from burning out.)

Importantly, you want to set your white balance on daylight. I'd strongly recommend shooting raw.

You'll want to scout during daylight to find foregrounds that will occur beneath the Milky Way and tie it to ground. I use PhotoPills AR function to show me where the Milky Way will be in relation to foreground at any given point in time--very useful.

Check and recheck your focus. Consider taping your focus ring in place once you've got it. Manual focus only, in my experience--and even that can be difficult. Zoom in to check that your stars at as close to pinpoint as possible. Don't believe people who say that focusing on something a few hundred feet away is accurate enough for stars--it isn't.

If you have a nice foreground, consider shooting that with longer exposures lit by starlight and blend that with the silhouetted foreground of your sky images. You may want to refocus on the foreground. (In Bortle 1 conditions, the Milky Way can cast shadows--so it's certainly sufficient light to illuminate a foreground.)

If you want to jump into the deep end on post processing, read Roger N. Clark on the Internet. His advice is dated, but solid. (Though some disagree with him, and many go deeper still into post than he does.)

If the galactic center is visible at the time of year you are shooting, you probably want foreground that places that center behind it. At the times of year I shoot, that mostly means shooting toward the south. In that case, I try to avoid locations that have any sort of city lights even 100-200 miles to the south, as their light dome can interfere.

If you get more into this, you may decide not to use a wide angle lens, and do panoramas (or "mosaics") with a fast, narrower lens. This is a big step up in quality, but is a lot more work. For this, I use a Sigma Art 40mm f/1.4; the mosaic I'm currently working on in post is five frames wide and five frames high, shot on a star tracker, for a total of 25 frames with 30 percent overlap. But this is not for first time Milky Way shooting.

Enjoy!

--Chris S.



Jan 01, 2026 at 12:43 AM
jgoetz4
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Here's a good website for shooting the Milky Way.
https://focus-on-photography-forum.net/threads/the-official-shoot-the-milky-way-thread.665/
If you just want to shoot galaxies or nebulae go here.
https://focus-on-photography-forum.net/threads/galaxy-thread-post-your-deep-sky-images-of-galaxies.544/
Jim



Jan 01, 2026 at 06:37 AM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

AmbientMike
Offline
• • • • • •
[X]
p.1 #11 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Ming-Tzu wrote:
Yup, I'm in NYC. Just not experienced at all with figuring out where, when and "how" to see it. I don't want to drive hours upstate or deep into Long Island just to be disappointed haha. The only thing I know is times around the New Moon are better because of the moonlight.

Trying to understand the basics of your posts about timing and location. I have to do more research on the whole "movement" of the MW to understand how high/low it is in the sky, when to see it best, etc.

Thanks!


Ok lemme back up a bit, when you said Milky Way, and September, I assumed you're talking about the summer Milky way, since that's the coolest area (especially Sagittarius and Scorpious area, center of the galaxy) and it's high in the evening around that time of year. That region is to the south even here in TX, and it's even higher in the sky from the Southern hemisphere. You can see milky way summer or winter, though, and some of it gets quite high in the sky (Cygnus area is cool, too, great rift dark nebula,) but the further north you go, the closer the horizon the Sagittarius area is.

The moon rises about an hour later each night after the full moon. So if you go out, say, 5 days after the full moon, you should have several hours in the evening where the moon is gone. Pretty easy to look up moonrise on weather site or something, feel free to ask more questions this might take a few posts lol

24 hours in a day, 12 months, so 2 hours per month change for celestial objects, i.e. Milky way same location 10 p.m. in August, 12 a.m. july, 2 a.m. June, etc. Also Cuchara pass has excellent hiking nearby, very dark location, the West much darker locations, lots of them, however cherry Hill in Pennsylvania popular. And you might get good view of scorpious Sagittarius looking south from long Island away from the city. I've gotten excellent views from the Gulf (south over the ocean, having basically no light pollution) even though overhead was kinda bad



Jan 01, 2026 at 12:15 PM
Greg Futral
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Cherry Springs State Park in PA is designated as a dark sky park. It might be worth considering.

https://darksky.org/places/cherry-springs-state-park-dark-sky-park/

There are more links, just google.



Jan 01, 2026 at 01:36 PM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


AmbientMike wrote:
Ok lemme back up a bit, when you said Milky Way, and September, I assumed you're talking about the summer Milky way, since that's the coolest area (especially Sagittarius and Scorpious area, center of the galaxy) and it's high in the evening around that time of year. That region is to the south even here in TX, and it's even higher in the sky from the Southern hemisphere. You can see milky way summer or winter, though, and some of it gets quite high in the sky (Cygnus area is cool, too, great rift dark nebula,) but the further north
...Show more

First off, thanks for the great post!

I just took a gander and actually didn't realize there were different parts of the MW lol.

It seems like the Galactic Core is what you mentioned as the "coolest area?" If I am reading these Capture The Atlas calendars correctly, the Galactic Core can be seen higher in the sky the more south I travel. In a place like Banff, which is far north, it sounds like I might be able to see it....but might be blocked by landscapes and/or the horizon and/or rising sun/moon.

In contrast, it seems like there's also the Milky Way Band part, which seems that I can see in northern areas of the world. Based on a few pictures online, I think this one also looks pretty damn spectacular haha.



















Jan 01, 2026 at 09:36 PM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #14 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Greg Futral wrote:
Cherry Springs State Park in PA is designated as a dark sky park. It might be worth considering.

https://darksky.org/places/cherry-springs-state-park-dark-sky-park/

There are more links, just google.


Yeah, I googled the Dark Sky areas and noticed this one too. When the weather is nicer and during a New Moon, I may take a little drive here and check it out.

Thanks!



Jan 01, 2026 at 09:38 PM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


The galactic core is ... the core of the galaxy. You have seen model drawings of the galaxy, as seen from a few lightyears away? It's a spiral with a big fat bright orb in the middle, while we are far out in an arm. When you're on earth looking in the general direction of the center of the galaxy, you're looking at the galactic core. You can be looking in a different direction, and still see plenty of stars - when you're looking elsewhere in the arms. But you have to be at the right time of the year to see the core.

Images you showed are just a different wide (or narrow) angle of the Milky Way. The picture below is from June in Namibia, the big bright blob in the middle of the milky way is the galactic core, wile the bottom of the band is us looking barely thru an arm.

Apps such as Photopills or TPE will show you the position of the GC.







Jan 02, 2026 at 01:19 AM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Very helpful information for a beginner. Thank you!


Jan 02, 2026 at 01:21 AM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #17 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Ming-Tzu wrote:
Very helpful information for a beginner. Thank you!


No worries. Now as for your other questions ... don't let anyone tell you the 5DsR isn't suitable for stars. Below a snapshot from a safari in November in Botswana ... 2016 that is. The 5D4 won't be any better. No experience with Fuji but in general you want as big a sensor as money can buy, to make the pixels as big as possible, so I would not show up with a cropper. R5 is better than R5m2, R3 is better than R1. Air free of light pollution and moisture is where it's at more than anything else. Yes the moon is a mood killer but quarter moon in Florida is a very different story from the same moon in Namibia. The easter island photo is with full moon, simply because I had no control over the travel dates. It also shows the flip side of the medal - if you can't control the illumination, you rely on the moon to do it for you. The Quiver Tree photo in my earlier post has the foreground illuminated with controlled lights (not flash). The Botswana photo has ... no foreground. In the photo of the Moai the reason you see the pasture and the Moai in the first place is because they were illuminated by the moon - no light painting would get that job done. So it's not strictly bad to have _some_ moon.

There are light pollution filters that work really well if you can't get far enough from civilization; it's not a miracle cure but it's a start.

Personally I'd show up ideally with an R5 and a 20/1.4 and bring a jacket.












Jan 02, 2026 at 01:37 AM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Incredible. Thank you!

Do you think 20mm would be wide enough? I have a Samyang 24 f1.4 but also a Samyang 14 f2.4. I would probably bring both just in case but just wondering how wide the arc might be without stitching. If I need to stitch, I guess I would do it like any other panorama aka vertical orientation with a pano head?



Jan 02, 2026 at 01:42 AM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #19 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


Ming-Tzu wrote:
Incredible. Thank you!

Do you think 20mm would be wide enough? I have a Samyang 24 f1.4 but also a Samyang 14 f2.4. I would probably bring both just in case but just wondering how wide the arc might be without stitching. If I need to stitch, I guess I would do it like any other panorama aka vertical orientation with a pano head?


Well, these days for stars I travel with the Sigma 14 and Canon 20. I was suggesting the 20 because had Canon had the 20 "back then," I would probably not have bought the 14. The 14 is a lovely lens and you will cover twice the sky, for sure, but it's not always necessary. If you have a 14, by all means, bring it, it will prove very helpful. You can always stitch but it's a pain in the ass, earth keeps moving in addition to the other hassles of panos. I don't bother with pano heads anymore, the software is way too good these days, unlike 15 years ago when we had to be far more religious. The below is a (not well processed) pano with the 20/1.4, no pano head.







Jan 02, 2026 at 01:52 AM
Ming-Tzu
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #20 · Milky Way photography --- September 2026 in USA/Canada


It looks pretty awesome to me!

Still researching and using the Capture the Atlas calendars as reference. He has it color-coded based on the best days to photograph the Milky Way, with pink the best and light blue the second best. I find it interesting when comparing some of the pink dates to the light blue dates. For example, for one calendar, I see a set of pink dates (best) with parameters like:

- Galactic Center Visibility of about 3.5 hours
- Vertical (65-80 degrees) positioning
- Moon Illumination of 15-20%

In contrast, a few weeks later at this location, he has it as light blue (second best) with arguably similar parameters:

- Galactic Center Visibility of about 2.5-3 hours
- Vertical (75-80 degrees) positioning
- Moon Illumination of 5-30%

The only major difference I see is that the pink dates offer about 30-60 minutes more visibility time. Other than that, it seems that the positioning is better during the light blue dates (assuming larger degrees means the GC is higher in the sky) and the moon illumination appears on par.

On another note, I am trying to determine my vacation plans. I'm a 1099 worker so dates are flexible. So wondering if it's better to vacation and try to see the MW arch or vertical. I know both will offer spectacular views though lol



Jan 02, 2026 at 03:59 AM
       2       3       end






FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register