fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual

  
 
motiwala
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


I am usually a Sony shooter, but I have kept the M system mainly for the 22/32mm; the combination is lovely and still hard to replace in terms of size/quality.

I saw a sale post on FB Marketplace for 11-22mm, and I am tempted to pick it up, but I am seeing quite a few failure/error reports across forums, more than with any other M lenses. For example, the 18–55 and 32mm seem to have a much better track record. Some of the posts mention:

- lens not detected / camera not powering on with the lens attached
- communication errors (often reported as Error 06)
- clicking or buzzing on startup
- aperture-related issues or the lens just becoming unresponsive

Another common thing I noticed in many of these reports was that the lens was not used much, and when brought back into use after a while, it failed. That is actually similar to my pattern, occasional shooting, multiple systems, and the lens may spend more time on the shelf.

At the same time, I am really tempted due to the size for a casual walk-around ultra-wide, especially compared to the Sony 16–35 GM I use.

Would love to hear from long-term users, and also those with similar “occasional use” patterns.



May 03, 2026 at 11:25 AM
jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


I've been using mine since I bought it new, in 2017. It's been on trips to Portugal, Italy, Ontario, and Utah. I've been using it quite a lot in the studio, for the last couple of years (and other EF-M stuff), because their small size and articulating screens, lets me use them in places where I have to fire up a remote display, for my larger, FF DSLR.


May 03, 2026 at 11:38 AM
Max10
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


I am owning the EF-M 11-22 for last 6 years, use it mainly during the Summer trips, no issue with mine.


May 03, 2026 at 11:48 AM
rmhh
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


My EFM 11-22 worked without problems. I had it for 3 years until I sold it to focus on FF. Note that it is collapsible.


May 03, 2026 at 02:09 PM
garyvot
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


I enjoyed mine when I had my M system. No failures.

According to Bryan's test charts at TDP, it seems to be the best of any of Canon's ultrawide APS-C zoom lenses, past or present.



May 03, 2026 at 02:57 PM
 


Search in Used Dept. 

johnctharp
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


Still using ours, primarily for video with the M6 II on a gimbal during vacations!


May 04, 2026 at 11:18 AM
motiwala
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


Thanks, here is one more concern. The seller describes,

"You need to "unlock" it to take a picture because the camera won't start if the lens is fully collapsed"

Is this the case with all 11-22, or is something wrong with this lens?




May 04, 2026 at 11:54 AM
Ripolini
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


The EF-M 11-22mm is the first Canon EF-series lens that is retractable, with an inner polycarbonate barrel that can be retracted for compact travel/storage, or extended into shooting position. If the lens is in the retracted position and you attempt to use the camera, a reminder to extend the lens is displayed.
Extending the lens into shooting position requires pushing the switch forward and rotating the zoom ring approximately 40° to reach the 11mm mark. The inner barrel extends approximately 0.6" (16mm) from the storage position to the shooting position. The lens locks in the shooting position, so the lens retraction switch must be pushed forward to retract the barrel into the storage position.


source:
https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-M-11-22mm-f-4-5.6-IS-STM-Lens.aspx



May 04, 2026 at 12:26 PM
rmhh
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Considering EF-M 11–22 - seeing more failure reports than usual


motiwala wrote:
Thanks, here is one more concern. The seller describes,

"You need to "unlock" it to take a picture because the camera won't start if the lens is fully collapsed"

Is this the case with all 11-22, or is something wrong with this lens?



Indeed as the previous poster indicates, this is perfectly normal. Similar to the EFM 15-45, it is a space-saving feature. Of course nobody forces you to collapse the lens; you can keep it non-retracted all the time, though it seems less vulnerable during transport when retracted.



May 04, 2026 at 01:15 PM







FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register