fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username  

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              1706              end
  

Post your recent film shots!

  
 
fjablo
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1707 #1 · Post your recent film shots!


lifeandmylens wrote:
1st is 8x10! The Xenotar is maybe 75 years old and has a similar rendering.


one can tell because the oof discs are slightly larger on the 1st and since 150/2.8 would be equivalent to 300/5.6, the 300mm f4.5 should be the one with a bit more background blur.

But they're so similar I wouldn't be able to tell without the direct side-by-side comparison..

Isn't 8x10 more about the quality though? I would imagine you get significantly more resolution, though not sure with these very old lenses..

Would be interesting how a 35mm image shot on a 50mm f0.95 / f1.0 compares. DOF should be similar to the 150mm f2.8.



Jun 08, 2026 at 12:05 AM
Cloud75
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1707 #2 · Post your recent film shots!


dourbalistar wrote:
Much appreciated, @Cloud75@! Yes, I'm the climber. The most painful part was running down in my climbing shoes so that I could position myself in a relatively static position before the self-timer went off.

If you haven't already ordered, I got my filters from B&H. They're made by Tiffen, relatively cheap, and available in several different circular sizes. A few of my lenses already use 52mm filter thread, so that's what I ordered:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/54250-REG/Tiffen_52R25_52mm_Red_1_25.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/54413-REG/Tiffen_5258_52mm_Green_58_Glass.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/54324-REG/Tiffen_5247_52mm_Blue_47_Glass.html

To account for the filter factors, I take an incident meter reading and add +3 stops, +2 stops, and +2 stops for R/G/B, respectively. It's not exact since
...Show more

Awesome. Already ordered from filterfind.net, along with some more stuff I was after. They're great, an excellent rec from @madNbad



Jun 08, 2026 at 12:18 AM
lifeandmylens
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1707 #3 · Post your recent film shots!


fjablo wrote:
one can tell because the oof discs are slightly larger on the 1st and since 150/2.8 would be equivalent to 300/5.6, the 300mm f4.5 should be the one with a bit more background blur.

But they're so similar I wouldn't be able to tell without the direct side-by-side comparison..

Isn't 8x10 more about the quality though? I would imagine you get significantly more resolution, though not sure with these very old lenses..

Would be interesting how a 35mm image shot on a 50mm f0.95 / f1.0 compares. DOF should be similar to the 150mm f2.8.


Yes, the extra compression of the longer lens on 8x10 is the primary difference in this particular comparison. It also shows that stopping down the lens on both at least a little is good. Neither are very sharp wide open. The Heliar for example, I often shoot at f/5.6 for the wide open look but with some added sharpness. The Zeiss 135 f/3.5 however, is sharp wide open.



Jun 08, 2026 at 06:07 AM
1       2       3              1706              end






FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              1706              end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register