GMPhotography wrote:
I would like to have a WATE for sure but I just can\'t get to the pricing. Now with all this, looks like I\'ll never get one. Lol
I would have to sell or trade the Cv 15 and reluctantly my Loxia 21. Than I\'m still short 1500 dollars. Stupid me I helped make the WATE famous years ago. Lol
Hi Guy,
Some of us decided not to get the Sony FE 16-35mm and bought the WATE instead. We saved ourselves the roulette of not getting a good FE 16-35, didn\'t purchase the Loxia 21mm, didn\'t purchase the CV 15mm III, and won\'t purchase the Batis 18mm. Ultimately we saved the headaches of also gettng a good Loxia 21mm, a good CV15mm III, and a good Batis 18mm. So, we saved on the merry-go-round of trying to get good copies and may well have paid less or only a bit more than those that purchased and decided to keep several of the mentioned Sony, Zeiss, and CV lenses. Plus we have benefitted from haveing a smaller and lighter package in a single lens.
Rich
May 10, 2016 at 06:36 AM
Previous versions of naturephoto1's message #13552370 « Official: Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 III E-mount »
