The 135mm should yield slightly more blur compared to the 85/1.4 GM when both are wide open and the 85mm image is cropped to 135mm.
Here is how they compare when moving the 85/1.4 GM closer to the subject to match the 135mm FOV. As you can see the relationship between subject and background changes.
Which do you prefer in terms of rendering? I find them similar under this scenario.
No particular preference here. I guess you’ll need to create either:
- bokeh balls, all the way to the frame edge
or
- a scene where the particular size of the background objects, as rendered by the different FLs, may prove advantageous to one of them
or
- some background that is particularly prone to creating “double vision” / “doubled edged” shapes
Mar 23, 2019 at 02:54 PM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
The 135mm should yield slightly more blur compared to the 85/1.4 GM when both are wide open and the 85mm image is cropped to 135mm.
Here is how they compare when moving the 85/1.4 GM closer to the subject to match the 135mm FOV. As you can see the relationship between subject and background changes.
Which do you prefer in terms of rendering? I find them similar under this scenario.
No particular preference here. I guess you’ll need to create either:
- bokeh balls, all the way to the frame edge
or
- a scene where the particular size of the background objects, as rendered by the different FLs, may prove advantageous to one of them
Mar 23, 2019 at 02:52 PM
Previous versions of vdo1's message #14799788 « Sony FE 135mm f/1.8 GM Review »
