Fair question, I'm not sure. My hope would be that it's just a reality of a WA focal length, and not some under-correction to minimize impact.
The more I think about it though, I do believe I've shot even wider than 28mm and have had straight lines near the edges. Some of my rotunda ceiling shots, etc.
Edit:
Went back and looked at some of my 14-24 shots at 14mm. I have straight lines SooC with distortion correction turned on.
Unless you can see the curvature of the earth at 28mm....which I somewhat doubt.
RoamingScott wrote:
I so rarely shoot 28 mm equivalent, would the horizon normally be straight that high in the frame?
tsdevine wrote:
If you slide the distortion slider to 125, the horizon gets pretty close to level. But then there is a further hit on the lower corners in terms of resolving ability.
RoamingScott wrote:
Here is a GIF I made of the uncorrected raw versus checking the profile correction option in Lightroom.
Mar 24, 2025 at 08:01 AM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Fair question, I'm not sure. My hope would be that it's just a reality of a WA focal length, and not some under-correction to minimize impact.
The more I think about it though, I do believe I've shot even wider than 28mm and have had straight lines near the edges. Some of my rotunda ceiling shots, etc.
Went back and looked at some of my 14-24 shots at 14mm. I have straight lines SooC with distortion correction turned on.
Unless you can see the curvature of the earth at 28mm....which I somewhat doubt.
RoamingScott wrote:
I so rarely shoot 28 mm equivalent, would the horizon normally be straight that high in the frame?
tsdevine wrote:
If you slide the distortion slider to 125, the horizon gets pretty close to level. But then there is a further hit on the lower corners in terms of resolving ability.
RoamingScott wrote:
Here is a GIF I made of the uncorrected raw versus checking the profile correction option in Lightroom.
Mar 24, 2025 at 08:00 AM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Fair question, I'm not sure. My hope would be that it's just a reality of a WA focal length, and not some under-correction to minimize impact.
The more I think about it though, I do believe I've shot even wider than 28mm and have had straight lines near the edges. Some of my rotunda ceiling shots, etc.
RoamingScott wrote:
I so rarely shoot 28 mm equivalent, would the horizon normally be straight that high in the frame?
tsdevine wrote:
If you slide the distortion slider to 125, the horizon gets pretty close to level. But then there is a further hit on the lower corners in terms of resolving ability.
RoamingScott wrote:
Here is a GIF I made of the uncorrected raw versus checking the profile correction option in Lightroom.
Mar 24, 2025 at 07:56 AM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Fair question, I'm not sure. My hope would be that it's just a reality of a WA focal length, and not some under-correction to minimize impact.
RoamingScott wrote:
I so rarely shoot 28 mm equivalent, would the horizon normally be straight that high in the frame?
tsdevine wrote:
If you slide the distortion slider to 125, the horizon gets pretty close to level. But then there is a further hit on the lower corners in terms of resolving ability.
RoamingScott wrote:
Here is a GIF I made of the uncorrected raw versus checking the profile correction option in Lightroom.
Mar 24, 2025 at 07:52 AM
Previous versions of tsdevine's message #16779475 « Fujifilm GFX100RF Discussion and Image Thread »
