So you are saying percentage increase matters more than actual area increase then? I'm pretty sure my eyes see actual size, not a comparison of what they have seen before. Area increase from APSC to FF - 495 sq.mm, FF to Gfx - 579 sq. mm. I'm not arguing with your conclusions, but just say you don't see the difference. No need to convert to percentage increase so the math appears in your favor.
I have experienced shutter slap on my Gfx as I described. Its is so strange looking, I wanted to better understand it and did some research. Its simply vibration with nowhere to go on a tripod. Unless you made the camera body more robust, bolting it to concrete is not going to help. I assume that why Fuji went with EFC to reduce vibration instead of adding mass to the camera.
Aug 22, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Previous versions of SGinNorcal's message #16875327 « What Fuji GF lenses would you like to see? »
