Impressions of 3D exist even without 3D pop (which, by the way, isn't defined, so one person understands this and another understands that term differently). In some cases, 3D pop is almost the exact opposite of an impression of 3D. This is precisely what makes this thread so utterly pointless. And nothing will change in the coming years. It will continue to go around in circles, just like the countless posts on the past 100 pages.
Dec 09, 2025 at 11:35 AM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Impressions of 3D exist even without 3D pop (which, by the way, isn't defined, so one person understands this and another understands that term differently). In some cases, 3D pop is almost the exact opposite of an impression of 3D. This is precisely what makes this thread so utterly pointless. And nothing will change in the coming years. It will continue to go around in circles, just like the past 100 posts.
Dec 09, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Previous versions of Nifty Fifty's message #16944774 « which lens has the most 3D POP? »
