I don't agree with the notion that the 35 FLE II is 'over- corrected'. That's a personal opinion perhaps, but not a technically accurate one IMHO. With a background as a long-time Director of Photography, I enjoy a clean modern lens- as long as it's not clinical- and there are some like that. Though I don't put the FLE in that category.
I'd rather the lens be sharp and well-corrected, and then choose from a wide range of filters (glimmer class, pro-mist, black satin...) to obtain the level of 'degradation I want. Such as adding glow, reducing sharpness, contrast, etc.
An 'over corrected' lens would be one that had pin cushion distortion, for example, and was over- corrected to then have barrel distortion. The FLE is not in that category- once again my opinion.
That all said.. if the imperfections in a particular more 'vintage' lens add up to a look you love.. of course go for it. I feel that way about the Elcan.
I might end up loving the LLL 11873- but so far can't quite see the reason to purchase if one already owns the FLE. However if I didn't own the FLEII.. the LLL 11873 could end up being a real contender. Awaiting other reviews and looks.
