First, thanks again to @geoffreyg for the test he shared. I realize now he is very humble. The test he shared was one that he did himself. He quietly shared the results rather than saying much about it. Thank you for all the work you put into it! I ended up downloading the files you made available. I think the Hasselblad looks lovely here. If I were shooting primarily architecture, interiors, or landscape, I would almost certainly purchase the Hasselblad 100C and be happy. It's small size is lovely. https://www.getdpi.com/forum/index.php?threads/digital-back-comparison.72376/
In terms of skin tones, I found two more tests:
Here is a test with Fuji, Canon, Sony, Phase One, and Hasselblad. The sony A7R was a pleasant surprise here. I like it's rendering. https://www.irstafoto.com/blog.php?page=144
Next, I found this comparison with Canon, Phase One, and Hasselblad:
I am now seeing a clear pattern, even with the newer X1Ds. The Hasselblad skin tones can jump around and look varying degrees of yellow to me. This is (for the most part) correctable in post, in the same way the red skin tones from Nikon are correctable. But I wanted to share this for anyone who finds this thread later.
Personally speaking, I like to find a rendering that leans in the direction I want to head. It makes it easier for me, and usually with better results. I find the human eye is very good at picking up on subtle difference in skin.
Hopefully this collection of tests will be helpful to anyone who is interested later. We all have different preferences. Thankfully we live in a time of many good options, and between the new and used market, there is probably something for everyone.
Thank you again to everyone who contributed.
Feb 02, 2026 at 04:16 AM
Previous versions of nickw_'s message #16978838 « Hasselblad vs Phase One Color »
