Steve Spencer wrote:
I do think the ladder and the ropes holding up the structure work as lines that add significantly to the perception of 3D. They are a pretty strong 3D cue in the image.
I’d agree with that, and add that photographing the subject from a point where a corner is closest (rather than photographing a side/end straight on) also contributes, as does the camera position being lower than the vertical center of the subject.
There’s also a tonal difference between the dark upper part of the structure and the very bright sky, and between the highlights on the lower structure and darker background — the latter, in particular, help separate the foreground object from its background.
There’s considerable vignetting in the image, which also serves as a sort of photographic surrogate for the way that our own visual system tends to give less attention to objects that are not our primary focus.
On top of that, the use of what I assume was at least a somewhat larger aperture softens the focus on the background elements noticeably.
Mar 19, 2026 at 02:29 PM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Steve Spencer wrote:
I do think the ladder and the ropes holding up the structure work as lines that add significantly to the perception of 3D. They are a pretty strong 3D cue in the image.
I’d agree with that, and add that photographing the subject from a point where a corner is closest (rather than photographing a side/end straight on) also contributes, as does the camera position being lower than the vertical center of the subject.
Mar 19, 2026 at 02:26 PM
Previous versions of gdanmitchell's message #17006279 « which lens has the most 3D POP? »
