Cloud75 wrote:
@Yogifi@ love the lego shallow dof shot! I have that 40/2 ultron too, and love it.
Thank you kindly - and I like the lens too, especially on film. I ended up using it the most because the focal length was so practical, and I only took one lens out each day. And it's so compact and has great sharpness.
I wish the the distortion a little less and the "transparency" was a tiny bit higher as it's a little bit crunchy but it's more noticeable when I use it with digital, or see shots with the 50/1.4 AIS. Though that's not as sharp at f2. And a little too tight for everyday for me. I grabbed the 50/1.2 for sharper at f2 but it is a little chunky and left it at home.
I think most of the shots posted above were with the 40mm, and another bonus one in a similar vein to the lego shot with the same lens:
Quite a few times I couldn't shake the thought that the rolls were toast due to the CT scanner. And so a couple more of a cactus for some reason:
"prickly pear cactus". I think they eat those as some sort of fruit.
Another with the 40mm:
And I think this was the 50/1.4 (probably at f4 from the looks of it, not 100%):
May 06, 2026 at 01:18 PM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Cloud75 wrote:
@Yogifi@ love the lego shallow dof shot! I have that 40/2 ultron too, and love it.
Thank you kindly - and I like the lens too, especially on film. I ended up using it the most because the focal length was so practical, and I only took one lens out each day. And it's so compact and has great sharpness.
I wish the the distortion a little less and the "transparency" was a tiny bit higher as it's a little bit crunchy but it's more noticeable when I use it with digital, or see shots with the 50/1.4 AIS. Though that's not as sharp at f2. And a little too tight for everyday for me. I grabbed the 50/1.2 for sharper at f2 but it is a little chunky and left it at home.
I think most of the shots posted above were with the 40mm, and another bonus one in a similar vein to the lego shot with the same lens:
Quite a few times I couldn't shake the thought that the rolls were toast due to the CT scanner. And so a couple more of a cactus for some reason:
"prickly pear cactus". I think they eat those as some sort of fruit.
Another with the 40mm:
And I think this was the 50/1.4 (probably around f4?):
May 06, 2026 at 01:18 PM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Cloud75 wrote:
@Yogifi@ love the lego shallow dof shot! I have that 40/2 ultron too, and love it.
Thank you kindly - and I like the lens too, especially on film. I ended up using it the most because the focal length was so practical, and I only took one lens out each day. And it's so compact and has great sharpness.
I wish the the distortion a little less and the "transparency" was a tiny bit higher as it's a little bit crunchy but it's more noticeable when I use it with digital, or see shots with the 50/1.4 AIS. Though that's not as sharp at f2. And a little too tight for everyday for me. I grabbed the 50/1.2 for sharper at f2 but it is a little chunky and left it at home.
I think most of the shots posted above were with the 40mm, and another bonus one in a similar vein to the lego shot with the same lens:
Quite a few times I couldn't shake the thought that the rolls were toast due to the CT scanner. And so a couple more of a cactus for some reason:
"prickly pear cactus". I think they eat those as some sort of fruit.
Another with the 40mm:
And I think this was the 50/1.4:
May 06, 2026 at 01:08 PM
Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /var/www/vhosts/fredmiranda.com/httpdocs/forum/viewedits.php on line 155
Cloud75 wrote:
@Yogifi@ love the lego shallow dof shot! I have that 40/2 ultron too, and love it.
Thank you kindly - and I like the lens too, especially on film. I ended up using it the most because the focal length was so practical, and I only took one lens out each day. And it's so compact and has great sharpness.
I wish the the distortion a little less and the "transparency" was a tiny bit higher as it's a little bit crunchy but it's more noticeable when I use it with digital, or see shots with the 50/1.4 AIS. Though that's not as sharp at f2. And a little too tight for everyday for me. I grabbed the 50/1.2 for sharper at f2 but it is a little chunky and left it at home.
I think most of the shots posted above were with the 40mm, and another bonus one in a similar vein to the lego shot with the same lens:
Quite a few times I couldn't shake the thought that the rolls were toast due to the CT scanner. And so a couple more of a cactus for some reason:
"prickly pear cactus"
Another with the 40mm:
And I think this was the 50/1.4:
May 06, 2026 at 12:54 PM
Previous versions of Yogifi's message #17033274 « Post your recent film shots! »
