Fischkombinat wrote:
Hi,
I've been reading this forum for a long time, but I finally decided to register after I bought a Nokton for E-mount based on the pictures here.
Now I've taken some test shots, but I'm not sure if the lens renders properly or if the image quality is good.
I also have a Sony 20mm 1.8 here, which is absolutely sharp even in the corners at 1.8.
Is it allowed to post links to my Lightroom album here in the forum so that someone can take a look at pictures of the Nokton?
vertigo1959 wrote:
this thread is a great example of just how good a forum can be, its packed with stunning images and sensible discussion about this amazing lens.
the only thing that is always missing is editing info for posted pics associated with a discussed lens..ie. was pic modified is it ooc?..
modlin wrote:
the only thing that is always missing is editing info for posted pics associated with a discussed lens..ie. was pic modified is it ooc?..
I think it’s safe to assume that every image is post processed unless stated otherwise.
Apr 14, 2025 at 01:33 PM
Steve Spencer Offline • • • • • • • Upload & Sell: On
mudlake wrote:
I think it’s safe to assume that every image is post processed unless stated otherwise.
I agree. My photos in this thread were certainly post processed. When Fred posts reviews he is almost always very clear about exactly the amount (typically very little) post processing that has been done. Most of the rest of us aren't so clear. I know personally I always post process to taste and nothing is systematic. You get what I think looks best. If you ever have a question about what someone has done, however, don't be afraid to ask. People are generally willing to share what post processing they have done.
Most post processing moves can be inferred pretty well from a set of images, and in time you see each photographer's style. Many tools are reasonably obvious if pushed too far in either direction. You can easily enough average out over many images from a particular lens from different people, and this distillation process usually demonstrates what we call the lens signature.
Some elements are very difficult to post manufacture and it's often very time consuming to do so. Most look for lenses that give them a decent foundation from which to finish in post. You really need to see around 200 images with a maximum of ten from any one member in that total.
Most of us post what might be called representative images, ones with nothing fancy that could not be achieved by other users of the lens. I suspect the days of Unibal and LAB are long gone, and focus stacking is rare. But people surprise you endlessly, in a quite recent thread I found out a number use 'drop in' skies, eek, and admitted to it.
The more images a member posts, the more likely he spends just 5-10 minutes on each image. ;-)
To augment your emerging take on a specific lens, seek out other sources like good YT guys, who have to get the reviews done to a tight schedule, look for those who have similar styles to you.
Robin Smith wrote:
I like my Nokton, but I would never consider it small.
It’s a fabulous lens, for sure, I had exactly the same thought. @Al Trujillo , it’s the CV Nokton 21mm f/1.4, yes? Everything is relative, I suppose, it is small compared to quite a number of autofocus Sony lenses (not to mention DSLR ones).
Edit to add: I also thought the racetrack photo was fantastic, a perfect example of why I like the 21mm focal length so much. It has been a pleasure to look at this thread again recently.
