Quick follow-up... I received the newest version from Xometry and it works great. The coding slots are a perfect match with one of my coded Leica lenses. I coded a couple of VM lenses and they both worked on the first try.
josh-himes wrote:
Quick follow-up... I received the newest version from Xometry and it works great. The coding slots are a perfect match with one of my coded Leica lenses. I coded a couple of VM lenses and they both worked on the first try.
I'm glad it worked out! I’ve been using this version as well, and it's been consistently reliable.
"I'm currently working on improved frame version with more comfortable handling and better version of mount lock. Though current template is well usable."
does anyone knows when it is expected to be released the new version?
Hello, thanks for asking. Yes I had plans to make updated version at some point, though at near same time discovered that number of my STL models shared for non-commercial use are printed and sold on eBay without permission.
It was highly discouraging, so I postponed that effort and prioritized other projects.
I recently discovered that eBay has copyright infringement reporting process, so thanks to that I was able to shut down most listings. There are still few I'm dealing with currently (and I could use that time and effort to create something new).
If I find time and most important a motivation again to create improved and still free to use version, it will be posted here.
yukosteel wrote:
Hello, thanks for asking. Yes I had plans to make updated version at some point, though at near same time discovered that number of my STL models shared for non-commercial use are printed and sold on eBay without permission.
It was highly discouraging, so I postponed that effort and prioritized other projects.
I recently discovered that eBay has copyright infringement reporting process, so thanks to that I was able to shut down most listings. There are still few I'm dealing with currently (and I could use that time and effort to create something new).
If I find time and most important a motivation again to create improved and still free to use version, it will be posted here....Show more →
I am sorry to hear that, what is wrong with people? I love your work, thank you for sharing.
yukosteel wrote:
Hello, thanks for asking. Yes I had plans to make updated version at some point, though at near same time discovered that number of my STL models shared for non-commercial use are printed and sold on eBay without permission.
It was highly discouraging, so I postponed that effort and prioritized other projects.
I recently discovered that eBay has copyright infringement reporting process, so thanks to that I was able to shut down most listings. There are still few I'm dealing with currently (and I could use that time and effort to create something new).
If I find time and most important a motivation again to create improved and still free to use version, it will be posted here....Show more →
That's honestly outrageous. Greed really is one of the ugliest human traits. Someone takes the time to design, test, and freely share something with the community, and instead of respecting that generosity, people immediately look for a way to profit from it.
What makes it worse is that the people selling your work are not just making money off your effort, they're also draining the motivation of the person actually creating something valuable in the first place. It is the fastest way to kill creativity and goodwill in a community.
Glad to hear ebay at least has a process to fight back against it...even if it still wastes your time and energy. Hopefully you eventually find the motivation again, because people who genuinely appreciate your work far outnumber the opportunists.
Thank you, I do have a bit of motivation, yet need to find good amount of time.
The latest version of O-shaped coder is solving problem of radial centering of the 6-bit sockets, comparing to C-shaped coders where thicker print may introduce offset due to inner arc is becoming slightly shorter.
It is still possible though to 3Dprint the O-shaped coder with error to position of the mount lock. I'm considering to add that lock separately, so its position can be fine tuned on already coded M lens.
Another consideration is the size - I made the O-shaped coder minimalistic and faster to 3D print. On the other hand making it double-purpose would increase its usability, e.g. if I make it slightly larger but with a rear cap to cover the glass from possible dust and debris, while applying 6-bit sockets paint and letting it dry.
FDM print has its limitations and particular direction of additive print. If I make next O-shaped version modular - it will be easier to print separate parts as optional, and possible to extra calibrate already printed copy.
yukosteel wrote:
Thank you, I do have a bit of motivation, yet need to find good amount of time.
The latest version of O-shaped coder is solving problem of radial centering of the 6-bit sockets, comparing to C-shaped coders where thicker print may introduce offset due to inner arc is becoming slightly shorter.
It is still possible though to 3Dprint the O-shaped coder with error to position of the mount lock. I'm considering to add that lock separately, so its position can be fine tuned on already coded M lens.
Another consideration is the size - I made the O-shaped coder minimalistic and faster to 3D print. On the other hand making it double-purpose would increase its usability, e.g. if I make it slightly larger but with a rear cap to cover the glass from possible dust and debris, while applying 6-bit sockets paint and letting it dry.
FDM print has its limitations and particular direction of additive print. If I make next O-shaped version modular - it will be easier to print separate parts as optional, and possible to extra calibrate already printed copy....Show more →
If we were to print one today, which do you recommend? The C-shaped coder or the ring?
Sam N wrote:
If we were to print one today, which do you recommend? The C-shaped coder or the ring?
Results may vary depending on print flow quality. I'd recommend O-shaped one, though if print is highly precise, classic C-shaped may work well and takes less material to print. If you got printed C-shape - check that inner arc wall is flat and even. On opportunity double-check on existing 6bit coded lens - for both templates.
